Thursday, July 19, 2018

What is "senryu" again? Commentary and results of two senryu competitions - the sibling genre of haiku


manga portrait & text©Alan Summers



Not one, but two senryu competitions!  

As President of the United Haiku and Tanka Society I made a short commentary on the first placed verse, and as the Sonic Boom judge for senryu, scroll further down, I was able to write up a report on all the placed/winning senryu entries.

Intrigued by senryu? Karen is working hard on a number of online courses including one on senryu. Please check regularly for updates here: 





The two web links to the contests!


The 4th Sonic Boom Annual Senryu Contest 
that I judged and you can read my comments:
https://area17.blogspot.com/2018/06/being-human-ordinary-intensity-look-at.html


and:

The “AHA” Haiku/Senryu Contest (Annual Hortensia Anderson Memorial Awards) Results
(June 2018):
https://mailchi.mp/86c0b005981f/june-2018-seedpods-addendum?e=206f1bb08e


Do also see the other Sonic Boom ANNUAL SENRYU CONTEST Results:

https://sonicboomjournal.wixsite.com/sonicboom/previous-winners




As President of the United Haiku and Tanka Society, I added a commentary on the first placed verse, in addition to the wonderful comments by Debbi Strange.


Here’s my President’s commentary:
The “AHA” Haiku/Senryu Contest (Annual Hortensia Anderson Memorial Awards) Results
Alan Summers
President, United Haiku and Tanka Society

What is a senryu?  
There is always an exciting and ongoing debate about that, and whether it is even a separate genre. I certainly see the senryu approach as a useful reminder that, as beautiful as haiku can be, we often need a short sharp verse that highlights aspects, and can act as checks and balances within our current society. 

I wish I could add commentaries to all the wonderful poems, thank goodness Debbie has done that for us. I can certainly empathise with this senryu by Jay Friedenberg, that stayed with the judges. The idea of working out all the numbers and ramifications of those who have died since humans entered this world must be unimaginable, whether by natural causes or other means. 

Leopold Kronecker (1823 – 1891) said: 
“God made the integers; all else is the work of man.” 

And those integers are part of the mathematics we may have learnt in school. Natural numbers are 1, 2, 3, 4,… where we simply add 1 to the previous number to get more, and more. We do use the zero symbol as a placeholder, “10” for example, as well as in the millions, and billions. If we accept “nothing” can be like a number, it’s possible to go even further. The concept appears in our regular lives, such as when you spend more money than you have, so our financial balance is negative, less than 0. Unfortunately we can’t see these negative numbers, but we can do calculations with them. So if we have real numbers, what are irrational numbers? They are those numbers which can’t be written as fractions. 

Yet in war, that is often the case, with the chilling example of the Deadly Blue Pencil when documents were manually cut and pasted, and a blue pencil chosen as it was not visible when finally photographed. At a meeting with Winston Churchill, the British prime minister, he watched as Stalin take out his blue pencil to make a large tick approving a “percentages agreement” for the division of Europe after the war, at an untold cost to human life, even after the war.

So Jay Friedenberg’s extraordinary senryu immediately reminded me of this (in)famous haiku:

戦死者が青き数学より出たり

war dead 
exit out of a blue mathematics

     -- Sugimura Seirinshi (trans. Richard Gilbert and Itō Yūki)


When I read Debbie Strange’s commentary again, I get even more chills down my body.  

But not all senryu are required to be as potentially unnerving as the almost casual approach to statistics, as above, in and out of war, and peacetime. In fact the remaining senryu and haiku are just as powerful, and just as important, in their own ways. 

I am so incredibly grateful for all the entries, whether ‘placed’ or not.

The full report can be read here:
Judges: Grant Savage and Debbie Strange
Commentary: Debbie Strange

No comments:

Post a Comment